I have to
admit, I knew practically nothing of Henry IV, having not even read
any of the relevant Shakespeare plays. However, I have read the same
author’s biography of Edward III (review here) which helps put
together the situation in which Henry IV (and his cousin and
predecessor Richard II) found himself.
The dual
nature of the early half of the book, with Henry’s actions
practically defined in contrast and reaction to those of the
vindictive and insecure Richard, was very engaging to read. Both men
were intelligent and almost the exact same age, but their characters
were utterly different (Henry was luckier than Richard in knowing his
father well, whereas Richard’s died when he was young). Both
struggled with the looming shadow of Edward III’s long and (mostly)
glorious reign, being grandsons of the aforementioned king.
Not
unlike a biography of William Marshal, the rollercoaster of Henry’s
life is fascinating to read purely on its own merits. Ian Mortimer
does a good job putting things into context where necessary, and
letting the drama speak for itself.
Whilst
Richard was sly, Henry was devout and personally brave. He was also
bloody unlucky on numerous occasions, and his early reign damaged by
naivety, the consequences of which took some time to overcome. He
was, however, decisive and committed, which helped to stave off the
worst effects of his frequent misfortune.
There are
numerous interesting questions about Henry and how he ought to be
viewed. As well as his unorthodox manner of arriving at the throne,
he executed an archbishop, and generally struggled with money, which
then hampered his efforts to fight the Scots/Welsh/French.
It’s a
life well told, packed with political scheming and rivalry, family
feuds and numerous rebellions. It’s very good, and would work well
with (either before or after, as you like) the same author’s
aforementioned Edward III biography.
Thaddeus
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNice review - makes me tempted to read it. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks. It's about as modern as I go (usually), but the dual nature of the early part was unexpected and very engaging. It was a little like the same author's Roger Mortimer biography (The Greatest Traitor).
Delete