I am, it’s fair to
say, rather late to this tap dance. However, I did recently see this
film. And so I thought I’d ramble about it (this is my blog, after
all, home of rambling about sci-fi and fantasy. And history).
For those who haven’t
seen it yet, this ramble will be laden with spoilers, so if you don’t
want them, stop reading now.
Sometimes in really
grim/serious films (Batman Begins, for example) I wish they’d add a
little levity. I don’t mean change the overall tone, but people
crack jokes, even if just as a coping mechanism in terrible
situations. In World War One, when soldiers were pinned down in
trenches with dead friends, they’d prop the bodies up (mimicking a
soldier on guard duty) and shake their hand when they walked past.
It’s ok to have a joke now and then, even if it’s still pretty
grim.
The Last Jedi is the
opposite. It’s ok to be serious now and then. Impending evacuation
under heavy fire, wildly outgunned? Better crack a joke then. Waking
up from some sort of medically induced coma? Slapstick and leaking
time.
Star Wars has always
been (mostly) family friendly (very friendly if you include the
incestuous kissing in Empire Strikes Back). That doesn’t mean it
can’t take things seriously, just occasionally, when dealing with
what is, essentially, war between good and evil. Darth Vader could
crack a joke (as Captain Needa discovered), but he was still a
serious character. Hux is practically comic relief.
Captain Phasma and her
rubbishness returns. Cool armour, lame turn of events. And then
there’s Snoke (daft name), the pale imitation of Emperor Palpatine.
But what really annoyed me about Snoke was how damned contrived and
clunky the dialogue was when he ‘read Kylo Ren’s mind’ and saw
him turn the lightsabre (yes, Americans, sabre is spelt this way in
England) and kill his ‘true enemy’. … Decent twist to have him
kill Snoke but the lumbering awkwardness of the dialogue and the
mental hoops to jump through detracted from it.
In the same way JJ
Abrams doesn’t understand the basic concept of space being big, it
seems Rian Johnson didn’t understand the first thing about Star
Wars. Or, if he did, he wanted to ‘interpret’ it (ie damn
internal consistency) in the same way that Russell T Davies buggered
up Davros’ character in New Who*. Luke, the hopeful hero who
believed he could turn Darth Vader, apparently now thinks about
killing his own student whilst he sleeps, and attempts it in such an
incompetent way he accidentally turns said student evil. And is also
capable of being defeated by same student.
Right.
Not only that, Luke
apparently knows how to speak Wookie less well than Rey, who
helpfully translates what Luke’s close friend Chewbacca has to say.
The plot wasn’t
hugely engaging. Star Wars does get knocked for rehashing the Death
Star story (although it’s worth noting that The Empire Strikes Back
had nothing to do with that and is the best film by a mile), but this
effort did make me wish there was a superweapon on the loose.
The storyline is that
they need fuel after evacuating. The First Order is chasing down the
tiny remnants of the Rebellion. Rightyho. Not the most engaging plot
ever.
I do disagree with some
criticism I’ve read. Rose wasn’t my favourite character but she
wasn’t terrible.
Some have criticised
the revelation that Rey’s parents were not especially significant,
but I don’t think that was a problem at all. Not everyone has to be
related. Plus, the weird relationship she develops with Kylo Ren
would’ve been, er, a bit weirder if they’d been related and she
*had* been Luke’s daughter.
I think Luke appearing
effectively as an astral projection to Kylo Ren was fine (that’s a
new power rather than one which contradicts previous rules of the
universe), although his inexplicable death afterwards was both
nonsensical and a very stupid way of killing one of the franchise’s
key characters.
It was absolutely
irrational that Admiral Holdo decided to ram, at hyperspeed, Snoke’s
ship. And that it worked. Yes, noble self-sacrifice, etc. But it
doesn’t actually make any bloody sense at all. The premise was that
the Rebel cruiser was the only ship that could be tracked and
therefore the smaller escaping ships would be safe as all First Order
attention would be on the cruiser Holdo was piloting. She was drawing
it away and would be killed (the plan was foiled when the First Order
was able to fire on the smaller ships after all).
So why not ram Snoke’s
ship to start with? If you’re certain to die and the options are to
die alone or take down a huge ship and thousands of enemies, why
wouldn’t the latter be your first option? For that matter, why
wasn’t that approach used with the Death Stars? Or the Starkiller
base? You don’t even need a human aboard, just get a droid to pilot
a large, empty ship. I’m really not a fan of plot ‘twists’ that
don’t actually make any sense.
I’d quite like to
watch Phantom Menace again to have a side-by-side view of the films.
I suspect the prequel would look good by way of comparison.
The flaws with The Last
Jedi, besides an uninspiring story, is that it contradicts what’s
been previously established, most obviously with Luke’s character.
It also has a lot of stuff that just feels unrealistic (yes, it’s
sci-fi and gets to break rules on faster than light travel, but even
fantastical stories have to maintain their own rules and have some
semblance of contextual realism. Otherwise Snoke could just snap the
Rebel ships in two using the power of his mind).
I tend not to do film
rambles/reviews, so didn’t post about this before, but I thought
Rogue One was pretty good. Had weak spots, of course, but I liked the
sense of certain doom, loved the ending, and, although some better
characters would’ve been good (likewise if the pointless monks had
been axed) it was a decent film.
The Last Jedi is the
weakest of the Star Wars films I’ve seen (all except Solo). I do
think the reaction has been over the top. Whilst not a great film,
it’s still just a film. Pouring abuse over people is not limited to
those who hate The Last Jedi, but it’s depressing to see (videogame
developers, politicians, almost anyone in the public eye can get
dogpiled with venom, sadly).
I’ve seen a little of
the fallout from the film. Boycott for Solo, hate for Rian Johnson
and the actress who plays Rose and so on. Disliking a film is fine
but personalising hatred online is just wrong. It’s like
complaining the well water is brackish and pouring in poison.
Anyway, those are my
rambling thoughts on The Last Jedi.
Thaddeus
*Spoilers for Doctor
Who:
Davros’ whole
character arc was creating the daleks, being betrayed by them and
then trying to (and eventually succeeding) in reasserting control.
Then in New Who, he actually agrees to be the compliant captive of
the dalek leader. Utter tosh. Tosh, I tell you!
Nice summary. I wasn't a big fan of The Last Jedi, but I found it enjoyable enough. (although I doubt if I'd watch it again.) I wonder if the PT is getting a little more credit now that we're two thirds into the new trilogy. :)
ReplyDeleteI must confess that the poor online behaviour of fans toward members of the cast is disgusting. I was disappointed when fans started bashing George Lucas, but this is a whole new level. What's worse is that it's my generation of fans that seem to be the spiteful ones. :(
Cheers.
DeleteYeah, disliking a film is fine but the level of vitriol is entirely uncalled for.
Episodes I-III are looking a bit better now.