Society can move
backwards as well as forwards. In the 14th century, a man
would probably get a far harsher sentence for cutting down a large
oak tree than he would for raping a woman.
This wasn’t because
Edward III was a fundamentalist tree-hugger. It was because large
oaks were cultivated and deliberately kept straight so the trunks
could be used as rafters in large structures and as the masts of
ships. Growing one took a damned long time, so if some pesky peasant
cut down a tree your grandfather planted, the blighter would probably
end up swinging from the nearest (intact) tree.
That explains the harsh
penalty for arboricide. But if a man raped a woman, then (unless it
was a nobleman’s daughter, in which case he’d probably round up a
posse and hang the culprit summarily), it’s unlikely she’d bother
reporting it. If she did, it would be unlikely to go any further. If
it did, the man would probably not be found guilty. If he were, he’d
probably be given a small fine. In short, being a nobleman’s
daughter was a good thing to be.
Language is another area of drastic change over the centuries. A four letter C-word is one of very few to
actually become considered more vulgar over time. Words like
‘mischief’ and ‘naughty’ are now so soft that any parent
would use them in front of any child. However, way back when, they
referred to things like going out on the rob, or an evening of rape.
[Sadly, this sort of attitude still exists today. Recently, soldiers
in South Sudan, in lieu of wages, were given permission to commit
rape].
In fact, women had
fewer rights under the Normans than they had centuries earlier under
the Anglo-Saxons. Now, I’m not claiming there was equality in the
9th century under Alfred the Great, but there was a
greater measure of it, for women, than they had under the Norman
kings. Aethelflaed, Alfred’s daughter, actually ruled Mercia in the
early part of the 10th century. It sounds bizarre that
society could move backwards, but this does happen. Progress is not a
straight line, and nor is it an inevitability.
After the Normans came
the Tudors, and their final monarch was Elizabeth I (some argue that
this was actually the perfect system of governance, where Parliament
had power but the monarch did too, ensuring a steady hand on the
tiller whilst also enabling a democratic element. So, neither mob
rule nor tyranny, but a combination of monarchy and democracy).
During this era, women began to gain still more equality with
exceptional individuals becoming doctors or writers. The
proliferation of literacy meant many women started putting together
practical books about cookery or medicine.
It should be stressed
this was still unusual, but a combination of Protestantism winning
the religious war over Catholicism (and Bibles being written in
English) coupled with a strong female monarch helped to encourage
female literacy.
A small aside: during
this era showing one’s cleavage was considered absolutely fine
(even Elizabeth I did it). However, a lady baring her arms or legs
was considered beyond the pale. Only the lowest of the low
(washerwomen) would do such a thing. So, a long-sleeved V-neck top
would be fine, but a short-sleeved t-shirt would be considered a bit
racy.
Showing one’s hair or
covering it up is another area where modern fashion can be radically
different to history. Hats were much more commonplace even 60 years
ago, and centuries past they were ubiquitous. For women, this often
entailed totally covering the hair. Loose hair could be seen as a
sign of, ahem, paid-for friskiness.
So, where are we now?
Not in the best of places. In many parts of the world (most
particularly the shrinking territory of black flag lunatics) women
are considered property, or slaves, and are forced to utterly cover
up. Their rights in all areas are curtailed or utterly secondary to
the whims of their husband/master. In the West, there are generally
good standards, although there are still black spots (banning the
image of a healthy woman in a bikini on the London Underground or the
wearing of the burkini in France).
If you enjoyed this
ramble, you might also like the following:
Thaddeus
Bit topical today ;)
ReplyDeleteHappens now and then. Not my fault if political candidates hold medieval views :p
Delete