I don’t write much
about politics on this blog, preferring to mess about with fantasy
and sci-fi, history and videogames. But today might well be the most
momentous political event of my adult lifetime, and the article I had
pencilled-in (videogames of E3) seems a bit limp given what’s
happened overnight.
Instead, here’s a
concise, hopefully objective, rundown of what has happened and what
the future might hold.
Background
Around
2014 UKIP (the United Kingdom Independence Party, which focuses [or
focused...] on leaving the EU) was doing very well in the polls. It
had enjoyed two defections from the Conservatives (MPs Douglas
Carswell and Mark Reckless) and went on to win the European Elections
in the UK.
To help
counter this threat, both at the General Election and in terms of
stopping more MPs defecting, Prime Minister David Cameron chose to
include a referendum on the country’s membership of the EU in the
2015 Conservative Party manifesto [NB an earlier referendum had been
promised by both major parties over the Constitution, which became
the Lisbon Treaty. This referendum was never held, and Brown signed
the Treaty anyway].
The
Campaigns
There
were various Leave and Remain campaigns. Almost all were
characterised by exaggeration, misleading statements and ill-humour.
Importantly, the traditional party lines were worthless. All parties
were split, the governing Conservatives more than any other party,
and the polls (after a very inaccurate 2015 set of forecasts) were
viewed with some suspicion.
The prime
advantage of Remain was the economy. For Leave, it was immigration.
Other areas such as security/defence were more evenly split.
Foreign
intervention during the campaign (for Remain) appears not to have
worked well, with many taking Obama’s claim that the UK would be
‘at the back of the queue’ as insulting. However, such
interventions were rare and did not play a major role.
[NB the
first MP in a quarter of a century, Labour’s Jo Cox, was murdered
about a week before polling day. This led to a suspension of
campaigning for a few days. Opinion is divided as to the polling
impact].
The Vote
On
polling day there was extensive rainfall, initially in Essex (mostly
Leave) and then in London (strongly Remain). Turnout was generally
high, around 72% (highest for a UK-wide vote this century, I think)
but a little lower in Scotland than elsewhere.
The
turnout in England was 73%, with 53.4% voting Leave.
The
turnout in Scotland was 67.2%, with 38% voting to Leave.
The
turnout in Wales was 71.7%, with 52.5% voting to Leave.
The
turnout in Northern Ireland was 62.9%, with 44.2% voting to Leave.
So,
England and Wales voted to Leave, Northern Ireland and Scotland voted
to Remain. The overall result was 51.9% for Leave.
What
Now? Part 1 – the EU
Leaving the EU happens by triggering Article 50. This is done by the
PM (more on that role below). When triggered, a 2 year formal
negotiation period occurs, at the end of which either a deal is
agreed (it may be interim or permanent, I believe) or not. If not,
the UK still leaves the EU but trade occurs under WTO (World Trade
Organisation) rules. [Edited extra bit: the process of negotiation may be extended if both the UK and EU agree to it. Cheers to the comments for that].
More widely, pre-vote polling suggested if the UK voted to Leave a
majority of Swedes (in the EU but not members of the single currency
eurozone) would also want to leave the organisation. There are also
significant numbers in France, the Netherlands and other EU countries
who are sceptical or wish to leave.
A problem for the EU is how to react. If it tries to be harsh to the
UK to deter other departures, that would substantially harm the Irish
economy (Ireland has more trade with the UK than the rest of the EU
combined). Not only that, the UK is a massive net importer from EU
countries, so making trade difficult would hurt the EU a lot as well.
However, if a more lenient approach is taken and the UK does well,
other countries may conclude that leaving the EU may work for them.
That said, very few countries are in the EU but outside the eurozone,
so we may see non-eurozone countries leave and eurozone nations
integrate further (the latter is already underway).
A final note on Ireland: the particular political history here is
fraught. Currently, the Northern Ireland/Irish Republic border is
open. This may or may not be the case, depending how the exit
negotiations go. It will almost certainly make the political
situation even more turbulent.
What
Now? Part 2 – party politics
David Cameron resigned the morning after the night before. His speech
was dignified and statesmanlike, and I can’t help but feel had he
spoken that way during the campaign Remain would have won handily. He
anticipates a new Conservative leader (and therefore Prime Minister)
being in place by October of this year.
There are various candidates. Boris Johnson is the first name that
springs to mind, but, personally, I feel he will not get it. The
single issue of British politics now is the departure from the EU,
and whilst Boris is seen by many as a likeable man, he is seen by few
as a hard-headed negotiator with a head for details. Teresa May, who
kept largely out of the fray, must be a strong contender. Others such
as Michael Gove, Nicky Morgan and George Osborne seem unlikely
(respectively: don’t want it, not sharp enough, too disliked).
Cameron has said he will not trigger Article 50 (see above), and that
it is a matter for his successor.
At the time of writing (12.39pm on Friday), Labour MPs are rumoured
to be laying down a motion of no confidence in Jeremy Corbyn. We may
have an unprecedented degree of disunity and leadership elections in
both major parties.
A General Election is scheduled for 2020, but it is possible the
Fixed Term Parliament Act could be repealed and a snap(ish) election
held in the next 6-12 months. It is possible UKIP could do very well
at such elections, although they’ve flattered to deceive in both
2010 and 2015.
It’s just over a year ago that Cameron won a shock majority in the
2015 General Election.
What
Now? Part 3 – end of the UK?
In 2014
Scotland voted 55% to remain within the UK. A second referendum north
of the border looks very likely. It is not certain, however.
There is
a possibility the new PM may opt for a close relationship with the
EU, whereby free trade and movement of people continues to occur
(this would necessitate, in all likelihood, a second UK-wide
referendum as migration was such a critical concern in the vote just
gone). If that were the case, and it were accepted, an independence
vote in Scotland seems unlikely.
However,
it is more likely than not that within a few years Scotland will have
another vote. Some serious issues from last time remain unanswered
(what currency to use?), but Scotland’s strong showing for Remain
will be seen by many as reasonable grounds for another vote (although
it must pass in the Holyrood Parliament).
Nicola
Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish National Party and First Minister of
Scotland, has stated today that she would want the referendum to be
held within the 2 year negotiation period following the instigation
of Article 50. The timing is interesting as, if held then, it would
mean Scotland may not actually leave the EU but continue inside it,
but also that Scotland would be voting whilst negotiations between
the UK and EU were ongoing.
There are
also (as above) potential difficulties in Northern Ireland, with a
possible resurgence in republican sentiment that may cause a
corresponding rise in unionist feeling.
But,
apart from the UK’s position regarding the EU, the next Prime
Minister, the next Leader of the Opposition, the continuing existence
of the UK and whether other EU nations may elect to leave it,
everything’s looking pretty stable.
Thaddeus
A fair summary.
ReplyDeleteI can only think of the old Chinese curse: "may you live in interesting times"
Cheers.
ReplyDeleteQuite. Ever since the 2007 election-that-never-was things have been turbulent, and they won't stop now.
Hi. It is not true that Britain must leave the EU at the end of the two-year period following the invocation of Article 50, regardless of whether a deal has or hasn't been agreed. The period may be extended if both the European Council and Britain agree to extend it. That's provided for in paragraph 3 of the said Article.
ReplyDeleteHey, Anonymous. Cheers for that, I'll amend the article.
Delete