I’m about two-thirds
into Simon Sebag Montefiore’s Stalin: the Court of the Red Tsar.
It’s not my usual time period, as regular readers will have
noticed, but I’m finding it engaging, and grimly enthralling in
parts.
And yet, there’s a
nagging irritation. Not with the book. It’s well-written and well
worth reading, but with my own vast ignorance. Consider Yezhov and
Beria. I’d venture to guess most of you have never heard of them,
yet have heard of Himmler, Eichmann and/or Heydrich, the architects
of the Holocaust.
It’s entirely right
and proper that we remember and continue to teach younger generations
about the Holocaust. That only makes it more bizarre and inexplicable
that, beside the vast ocean of Nazi, Hitler, and Holocaust dramas and
histories, there is very, very little about the Terrors under Stalin.
We’re not talking
small numbers of casualties. In total, millions were shot, or
consigned to slave labour in gulags. In stark contrast to the Nazi
approach of deliberately targeting Jews (and some other groups), the
Stalinist way was simply to have a quota for executions and
enslavement, and then for desperately enthusiastic underlings to
exceed said quotas. People weren’t killed because of a racial
hatred, but to make up the numbers.
Why isn’t more said
about this? Why isn’t more of it taught in schools, or portrayed in
dramas and histories?
There could be an
element of embarrassment. After all, the West (most obviously the UK
and US) were allied to Stalin’s Soviet Union in the latter half of
the war. That was necessary, but it’s never comfortable allying
with a genocidal tyrant. Yet, the USSR was an enemy at the war’s
start, and afterwards, so I’m not sure that argument holds water.
I asked the question on
Twitter (https://twitter.com/MorrisF1/status/1056835920702390272),
specifically about dramas, and received a number of interesting
answers, including one that the US (when the atrocities became known)
didn’t want to see another McCarthy to arise and didn’t comment
much on them. (For those interested, a couple of interesting
suggestions were made, including Burnt By The Sun and Stalin (Robert
Duvall), and the book All Stalin’s Men by Medvedev Roy
Aleksandrovich).
Might it be because we
never had a conclusive climax to a hot war? The Nazis were smashed,
ultimately, in a decisive defeat against the Allied powers. The USSR
collapsed in the latter years of the 20th century. It
wasn’t conquered by external armies, and it didn’t surrender to
the Allies.
Nevertheless, the lack
of media programming is still a void, a gaping chasm that should be
filled with histories and dramas. There are some fools in the UK
today who actually march quite happily under banners of Lenin and
Stalin, the hammer and sickle flying on red flags above them.
We would not see this
without excoriation it if those on the right marched beneath
swastikas and Hitler banners. And those comparisons are very apt. The
atrocities were, to a large extent, concurrent (1930s and 1940s), and
the numbers involved were comparable.
It’s a little
depressing when people know nothing of the Western or Eastern Roman
Empires, or are unfamiliar with even basic dates like 1066. But when
they’re totally unaware of atrocities carried out within living
memory it’s alarming. Our best hope of avoiding a repetition of the
tragedies of the past is if we’re aware of them.
Thaddeus
No comments:
Post a Comment