Gibbon, recognising that he lacked the time to continue his
work in the same detail as before, does miss out most of several centuries of
Byzantine history. Whilst this is a shame, there are some interesting
diversions, perhaps most notable chapters on Genghis Khan, Tamerlane and the
splintering and then fall of the caliphate.
The writing style remains sometimes tricky to read, but it's
merely highbrow rather than Shakespearian. I was pleased to see that although
Gibbon's dislike of Byzantium
generally continues he was full of praise for a certain emperor (I shan't spoil
it) who suffered a tragic fate.
Towards the end of the work we are taken back to Rome
for various shenanigans involving popes and we hear of the final tribune of the
Eternal City.
It ends with a couple of appendices, the latter dealing with
a list of the Roman emperors and the former with a few pieces of Gibbon
regarding the various updates and publications of his work. I must say that I
was pleased to hear him refuse to correct or change his earlier work as it
would offend those who bought the earlier version, and it brought a wry smile
to my face when I read of his decision to retire.
Given these are the final 3 volumes of a 6 volume work you
will either have disliked the first set, in which case you would be an idiot to
buy this, or you will have enjoyed it, in which case I recommend buying this
(although you may wish to skip the religion section).
Overall it's a masterpiece depicting the transient fragility
of human endeavour and the construction of mighty edifices which the erosion of
virtues and passage of time crumble into dust.
Thaddeus
Hey,
ReplyDeleteI know this post is ages old but I was curious what shop you bought this Everyman's Gibbon set from. Here in North America the copies sold don't come with dust jackets for each volume and I'd like to get a set like yours (which does).
Thanks!
Hey, sorry for the late reply (no idea why this tripped the filter).
DeleteI got them from Amazon (in the UK) rather than buying in-person. The thumbnail wasn't that accurate, from memory, because it was just the side of the box (which made it look like the cover). I'd be mildly surprised if there's a new version out already, so it's possible that it's an older version in stock (I have vague memories of seeing a 7 volume edition which has all the footnotes in the 7th volume).
Apologies again for the tardy response.