Well, nearly. The devices aren't commercially available and
I imagine there are many teething problems with such an unusual type of
transport but there is a working model which operates using two massive
underside fans to generate lift. It's also unclear what the power source would
be.
There are lots of obvious advantages to such a vehicle, if
it were commercially viable. Roads would not be needed, and rivers/lakes and
maybe even seas could be crossed. Unlike hovercrafts you would not need to
worry about the air cushion getting punctured, and vertical ascent could even
make it of use to mountain rescue (or particularly wealthy window cleaners).
However, the flying car has been something that people have
been trying to build for years and years, without real success. The issues are
numerous. For a start, a mid-air collision, unlike a land-based crash, involves
both the incident itself and then plummeting to earth. Even if the cars are
hovering rather than flying, the last thing you want after smacking into
someone else is a 5' plunge to the ground (and if it's a long way you'll want a
parachute). Secondly, the driving test is arguably too easy, but would you need
a pilot's licence for a hovering car? It might be better, then, as a plaything
for the rich and a practical tool for those whose working environment makes it
worth the effort rather than as a popular vehicle to replace the car.
It does look rather more practical than one of my favourite
vehicles, the bonkers but fun ekranoplan. The ekranoplan is a slightly mental
creation. It's a cross between a hovercraft and an aeroplane with stub wings.
It generates enough lift to raise itself off the ground (like a hovercraft
without the physical cushion) but not enough to take off and fly. They're
capable of moving at tremendous speeds over a flat surface (a frozen lake, for
example). A Soviet-era ekranoplan (aka ground effect vehicle or GEV) hit speeds
of 350mph whilst 20m above the sea.
Thaddeus
No comments:
Post a Comment