A chance comment by
someone else on the interweb over a decade ago is what first got me
into classical history. Since then, I’ve read a reasonable amount
on it, and thought a short list of suggestions for people thinking of
dipping their toe into it might be handy.
The list is in no
particular order, and I’ve linked to articles/reviews I’ve done if one
catches your eye [some books have no review link because I read them before I started blogging].
Alexander, Hannibal,
Caesar by TA Dodge
Theodore Ayrault Dodge
was an American historian who wrote biographies/military histories
around the three greatest generals of antiquity (entitled Alexander, Hannibal or Caesar).
There is a lot of
detail, but it’s not written in a way that’s difficult to
understand (indeed, Hannibal was the first classical history book I
ever read). There are also a great many maps and illustrations, which
is helpful for someone getting their first taste of classical history
and who has no idea where Ephesus, Miletus and Halicarnassus might be.
The focus is strongly
on the military. Lots of battles, strategy, explanations of cunning
marches and the like abound.
NB Be careful you order
the right book. Some abridged versions, not marked as such, have
appeared. The full version should be around 700 pages for the first
two, and almost 800 for Caesar.
John Julius
Norwich’s Byzantium Trilogy
Don’t be scared off
by the word ‘Byzantium’. I knew almost nothing, beyond that name,
of Byzantine/Eastern Roman history before reading this trilogy.
Afterwards, I was staggered I had such a gaping void of knowledge.
Norwich’s history is
compelling, easy to read, and has a strong focus on the political and
social dimension of the Eastern Roman Empire. Naturally,
battles/military matters feature, but they only take centre stage
when essential.
Apart from the very
start (Constantine rather unhelpfully called his children Constans,
Constantius and Constantine), there were rarely any moments I found difficult to follow, despite my dearth of knowledge. You’ll
marvel at the idiocy of the Fourth Crusade, the brutal skill of Basil
II, and the epic tragedy of Constantine Dragases’ death.
[NB technically, this
is more Middle Ages, as it covers 4th to 15th
century history].
Livy’s The War With Hannibal
A very accessible book,
The War With Hannibal is Livy’s history of the Second Punic War
(which had Hannibal as Rome’s antagonist-in-chief). It’s
extremely easy to read, and the strong leading characters (Hannibal,
Quintus Fabius Maximus, Marcellus, Scipio Africanus) give a personal
narrative which makes things simple to follow.
Unlike Polybius’
version (which I enjoyed but is both missing the end of the war and a
little drier), Livy covers the war from start to finish. In addition
to military aspects, he covers the human side of things, of adversity
and hope, triumph and disaster. He is biased towards Rome, but if you
go in knowing that it’s a very good read.
Suetonius’ Twelve
Caesars
Another very easy to
read book, this covers Julius Caesar and the first 11 emperors in
varying detail (Augustus was ruler for decades, Titus just a couple
of years). Suetonius has a lively, engaging style, almost like a
modern day tabloid or magazine writer. Although today’s historians
dispute some of his assertions (particularly those involving
Caligula) his tales are never dull. Suetonius does a very good job of
conveying the impression the early imperial Romans had of their first
rulers.
Legionary/Gladiator
Manuals, by Philip Matyszak
The Unofficial
Legionary/Gladiator Manuals are something a bit different. Although
light in tone, with humorous asides (a mosaic was captioned something
like “Having a leopard eat your face is one of the alternatives
that makes being a gladiator seem like a good idea”) there’s
actually a lot of accessible detail.
Unlike the other
histories I’ve mentioned, these two books (there are three other
non-classical books in the series) focus on the professions of being
a legionary around the time of Trajan (early 2nd century
AD, a high point for Rome) and a gladiator. There’s more day-to-day
detail than the general histories above, and those who prefer a
closer type of history rather than a focus on leaders may well prefer
one or both of these.
Thaddeus
Thank you very much.
ReplyDeleteGlad it's of some help :)
Delete